Judges and Officials of Women's Single Figure Skating in Sochi 2014

 

June 4, 2014

Written by FSU

Edited by SochiScandal.com

 

 

 

http://sochiscan4.tistory.com/entry/The-Panel-of-Judges-in-ISU-Judging-System


The above post lists general rules for Officials in ISU judging system. It may be summarized as follows:

위 포스트는 ISU 저징 시스템에서 심판들을 지정하는 것에 관한 일반적인 룰을 나열하고 있다. 요약하자면 다음과 같다:


1) Referee, Technical Panels (Technical Controller, Technical Specialist, Assistant Technical Specialist), Data Operator, Replay Operator : appointed by ISU (All ISU events including Olympic Qualifying event)

2) Panel of Judges

- Winter Olympic games, ISU Championships : by Judge Draw (only Member)

- ISU Grand Prix series (senior), international competition: invited by organizing member

3) Conflict of interest (Rule 121-2-b-j-ii "Personal, Commercial and Family Relationships" -5)

The term ”family” as used in this Rule shall be understood as including all persons who, due to their relationships, may reasonably appear to be in a conflict of interest position regarding a competing Skater, ineligible person or remunerated Coach.

1) 레프리, 테크니컬 패널(테크니컬 컨트롤러, 테크니컬 스페셜리스트, 어시스턴트 테크니컬 스페셜리스트), 데이터 오퍼레이터, 리플레이 오퍼레이터 : ISU가 직접 지정 (올림픽 퀄리파잉 이벤트를 포함한 모든 ISU 이벤트)
2) 심판
- 동계 올림픽, ISU 챔피언십 : 추첨 (국가만)
- ISU 그랑프리 시리즈 (시니어), 국제 대회 : 개최국이 초청
3) 이해 상충 (Rule 121-2-b-j-ii-5)
이 룰에서 말하는 "family"는 서로의 관계를 고려했을 때 출전 선수에 있어 이해상충이 발생할 것으로 판단되는 모든 사람, 부적격자, 보수를 받는 코치를 말한다.


http://www.isuresults.com/results/owg2014/SEG003OF.HTM

Panel of Judges for Olympic Winter Games Sochi 2014 Ladies Short Program



Panel of Judges for Olyimpic Winter Games Sochi 2014 Ladies Free Skating

 


 

Technical Controller - Alexander Lakernik

- The final arbiter for all technical elements (i.e. rotations of jumps, wrong edge for jumps, levels for spins and step sequence)

  : nomination, appointment, education of Officials

- Assistant Referee in Salt Lake Olympic Figure Skating (Pair) Scandal

테크니컬 컨트롤러 - 알렉산더 라커닉

- 기술 요소 판정 최종 결정권자 (예: 점프 회전수, 롱엣지, 스핀/스텝 레벨)

- 러시아 빙상연맹 이사회 부회장

- 싱글&페어스케이팅 기술위원회 의장 : 오피셜 임명, 지정, 교육

- 솔트레이크 피겨스케이팅 (페어) 스캔들 당시 어시스턴트 레프리

 


 

FS Judge No.2 Yury Balkov

kicked out of the sport — for all of a year — after he was caught red-handed, trying to fix the ice dance event at the Nagano Olympics in 1998 in a tape-recorded conversation with a wily Canadian judge.

http://www.canada.com/olympics/columns/blatchford-international-skating-union-out-of-touch-on-judging-controversy

프리 스케이팅 저지 2 유리 발코프

나가노 동계 올림픽 당시 아이스댄스에서 결과 조작을 시도한 것에 대해 경고를 받아 1년간 자격 정지를 받았던 심판

 

 


FS Judge No.6 Alla Shekhovtseva

- Judges at all events of Sotnikova in this season 

- Wife of FSFR General Manager Valentin Piseev

프리스케이팅 저지 6 알라 셰코프체바

- 이번 시즌 소트니코바가 참가한 모든 대회에 심판으로 참가

- 러시아 빙상연맹 단장 발렌틴 피시브의 부인

 

ISU 저징 시스템 : 2005/06 ~ 2014/15

English version is here


The ISU Judging System 또는 International Judging System (IJS) 는 2004년 ISU 총회에서 통과되어 2004/2005 시즌 이래 모든 피겨 스케이팅 국제 대회에 적용되어 왔다.(그랑프리 시리즈에는 2003/2004 시즌부터 적용) 자세한 사항은 각 영문 문서를 참고할 것.



싱글 스케이팅에서의 주요한 변화



2005/2006 season

Communication No.1319

Communication No.1342


1. 프리 스케이팅에서 트리플/쿼드러플 점프는 두 종류만, 두 번까지 반복할 수 있다. 만약 세 번째 점프가 컴비네이션이나 시퀀스로 시행되는 경우, 그 컴비네이션이나 시퀀스 전체에 점수를 주지 않는다.

(* 참고 : 2004/2005 시즌에는 반복된 점프의 점수는 제외하고 컴비네이션/시퀀스의 나머지 점프에 대해서는 점수를 주었다.)

2. 레이백 스핀에서 비엘만 포지션은 레이백 자세로 8회전 한 후에만 레벨업 요소로 인정된다.

3. 스핀, 스텝, 스파이럴 기초점 및 GOE 팩터 변화 

   1) 모든 스핀, 스텝/스파이럴 레벨 1 or 2 : 가산점 0.5배, 감점 0.3배

   2) 스텝, 스파이럴 레벨 3 : 가산점 0.5배, 감점 0.7배

   3) 스텝, 스파이럴 레벨 4 : 가산점 1배, 감점 0.7배



2006/2007 season

Communication No.1384

Communication No.1396


1. 여자 주니어 쇼트 프로그램에서 트리플+트리플 점프 컴비네이션 허용

2. 프리 스케이팅에서 트리플/쿼드러플 점프가 두 번 다 솔로 점프로 시행된 경우, 두 번째 점프는 "시퀀스"로 판정한다. (기초점 80%)

(* 참고 : 이전 시즌까지는 컴비네이션으로 판정(+COMBO)하고 모든 기초점을 주었다.)


판정과 관계 없는 변화

3. 기초점도 소수점 셋째 자리에서 반올림하여 표시한다.

(* 참고 : 이전 시즌까지는 기초점은 소수점 둘째 자리에서 반올림)

4. 점프의 회전 부족("<")이 프로토콜에 표시된다.




2007/2008 season

Communication No.1445

Communication No.1459


1. 점프 시퀀스 정의 변화 : 시퀀스에서 연결은 비규정 점프 and/or 홉으로 가능하며, 턴/스텝은 불허한다.

- 턴: 쓰리턴, 트위즐, 브래킷, 룹, 카운터, 로커

- 스텝: 러닝 스텝, 토 스텝, 샤세, 모호크, 촉토, 엣지 체인지, 크로스-롤

2. 더블 악셀 기초점 상향 (3.3 → 3.5) & GOE 감점 팩터 변화 (0.7배 → 0.8배)

3. 프리 스케이팅에서 더블 악셀 3회 제한

4. 러츠/플립 점프의 잘못된 도약 에지를 테크니컬 패널이 지적하고 저지는 GOE를 감점한다. (프로토콜에 "e" 표시)

5. 쇼트 프로그램에서 스파이럴 시퀀스 패턴 삭제

6. 스핀 레벨업 규정에 "카멜, 싯, 레이백, 업라이트의 어려운 변형 8회전" 추가



2008/2009 season

Communication No.1494

Communication No.1504

Communication No.1505


1. 트리플 악셀(7.5 → 8.2)/쿼드러플 점프군 기초점 상향 & 감점 팩터 상향(트리플 악셀 1.4배, 쿼드러플 군 1.6배)

2. 스텝 시퀀스 레벨3/4 기초점 상향

3. 스핀 종류별로 있던 레벨업 요소를 일괄 통일

4. 남자 주니어 쇼트 프로그램에서 트리플 악셀 (솔로 점프) 허용

5. 프리 스케이팅에서 요소 삭제

   1) 시니어 남자 싱글 & 여자 싱글 : 스핀 4개 → 3개

   2) 주니어 남자 : 스텝 2개 → 1개

   3) 주니어 여자 : 스파이럴 시퀀스 삭제

6. 스파이럴 시퀀스에서 한 자세를 6초 이상 유지하는 경우 레벨업 요소로 인정

7. 러츠/플립 점프의 잘못된 도약을 세분화

   1) "e" (edge) : 잘못된 엣지를 길게 사용 (long wrong edge) - 반드시 감점

   2) "!" (attention) : 잘못된 엣지가 짧거나 불명확 (short or not so obvious) - 감점 여부는 심판 재량에 따름



Communication No.1535

월드 챔피언십의 심판 숫자를 13명에서 9명으로 축소



2009/2010 season

Communication No.1557


1. 스핀의 레벨업 요소

   1) 스핀의 레벨업 요소에서 "양쪽 에지 사용"을 "에지 변화"로 용어 변경

   2) 스핀 컴비네이션 내에서 레이백 스핀의 백웨이 ↔ 사이드웨이 각 3회전을 레벨업 요소로 인정

   3) 발을 바꾸는 스핀인 경우 한 발에서 얻을 수 있는 최대 레벨업 요소는 3개

2. 회전 부족 표시("<")를 심판에게 보여 주지 않음. 슬로우 모션 없이 판단.

   2.1. GOE 가이드라인 변화

         회전 부족에 대한 GOE 강제 감점 (최종 GOE도 감점이어야 함)

         → 회전 부족으로 판단한 경우 GOE -1 ~ -3 (비강제)

         (* 회전이 부족한 점프에 대한 이중 감점 삭제)

3. 러츠/플립 점프의 잘못된 도약에 대한 용어 설명 변경

   1) "e" : 잘못된 에지

   2) "!" : 불명확한 에지


Communication No.1563

동계 올림픽의 심판 숫자를 13명에서 9명으로 축소


2010/2011 season

Communication No.1611

Communication No.1619

테크니컬 패널 핸드북 2010/2011 season

(피버스케이팅 번역본. 원문 포함)


I. 점프 관련

1. 점프의 회전 부족을 정도에 따라 세분화

   1) 회전이 1/4 초과 1/2 미만 부족한 점프 : "언더로테이티드" 점프, "<" 표시, 원래 기초점의 70%

   2) 회전이 1/2 이상 부족 : "다운그레이디드" 점프, "<<" 표시, 원래보다 한 회전 아래 점프의 기초점

2. 기초점과 GOE 팩터 전면 변화

   1) 더블 악셀 팩터 : 0.5

   2) 트리플 점프군 팩터 : 0.7

   3) 트리플 악셀과 쿼드러플 점프군 : 1.0 (4A는 1.2)



3. 러츠/플립 점프의 잘못된 도약 다시 "e"로 통일 : 심각한 정도에 따른 GOE는 심판 재량

4. "하프 룹"을 규정 점프로 포함시킴

   1) "점프+하프 룹+살코/플립 점프"는 더 이상 시퀀스가 아니라 "컴비네이션"으로 판정 (기초점 100%)

   2) 위의 경우 이 때 하프 룹에는 "싱글 룹"의 기초점을 주며, 이 점프 컴비네이션은 "3 점프 컴비네이션"으로 본다.

5. 시니어 여자 쇼트 프로그램에서 트리플 악셀 허용 (더블 악셀 or 트리플 악셀, 솔로 점프)

6. 시니어 남자 쇼트 프로그램에서 두 개의 서로 다른 쿼드러플 점프 허용

7. 프리 스케이팅에서 더블 악셀은 최대 2회까지만 허용


II. 스텝과 스파이럴 관련

1. 스텝 시퀀스 레벨업 요소 추가

   1) 원풋 스텝 추가 (패턴의 절반 이상)

   2) 어려운 턴 조합을 양방향으로 빠르게 시행 (시퀀스 내에서 적어도 두 번)

2. 시니어 남자 프리 스케이팅에서 2개의 스텝 시퀀스 → 1개의 스텝 시퀀스, 1개의 코레오그래픽 스텝 시퀀스

   2.1. 두 번째 스텝 시퀀스는 "코레오그래픽 스텝 시퀀스"로 콜하고 고정된 기초점을 가지며 GOE로만 평가한다.

3. 시니어 여자 쇼트 스케이팅에서는 스파이럴 시퀀스 없음 (트랜지션 취급) / 프리에서는 코레오그래픽 스파이럴 시퀀스

   3.1. 프리 스케이팅에서 "코레오그래픽 스파이럴 시퀀스"로 콜하고 고정된 기초점을 가지며 GOE로만 평가한다. 두 개의 서로 다른 스파이럴 자세를 각 3초 이상 혹은 하나의 스파이럴 자세를 6초 이상 시행해야 한다.


III. 스핀 관련

1. 스핀의 어려운 변형을 카테고리로 분류

   카멜 스핀 : 배꼽의 방향에 따라

     - (CF) 카멜 포워드 : 배꼽이 앞을 향함

       

     - (CS) 카멜 사이드웨이 : 배꼽이 옆을 향함

       

     - (CU) 카멜 업워드 : 배꼽이 위를 향함

      

   싯 자세 : 프리 렉의 위치에 따라

     - (SF) 싯 포워드 : 프리 렉이 앞에 있음

      

     - (SS) 싯 사이드웨이 : 프리 렉이 옆으로 있음

     

     - (SB) 싯 비하인드 : 프리 렉이 뒤에 있음

     

   업라이트 자세 : 상체의 방향에 따라

     - (UF) 업라이트 포워드 : 상체가 앞으로 숙여짐Upright Forward: with torso leaning forward

     - (US) 업라이트 사이드웨이 : 상체가 수직이거나 옆으로 있음

     - (UB) 업라이트 비엘만 : 비엘만

   레이백 자세

     - (UL) 업라이트 레이백

     

   중간 자세 (IP, intermediate position)

     

   속도 증가 (IS)

   스핀 내에서 점프 (JS)

    


2. 스핀 레벨업 방식 전면 변화

   1) 기본 자세 또는 (콤비네이션 스핀의 경우에만) 중간 자세에서의 난도 높은 변형

   2) 기본 자세의 다른 난도 높은 변형은 첫 번째와 확연히 달라야 하며 아래를 충족해야 함 

      - 발을 바꾸는 단일자세 스핀 : 첫 변형과는 다른 발 

      - 체인지 풋이 없는 콤비네이션 스핀 : 첫 변형과는 다른 포지션 

      - 체인지 풋이 있는 콤비네이션 스핀 : 첫 변형과는 다른 발 및 다른 포지션 

   3) 점프를 이용한 체인지 풋 

   4) 백워드 도입/난도 높은 플라잉 도입/플라잉 싯 스핀에서 테이크 오프와 동일한 발 또는 발을 바꿔서 랜딩 

   5) 싯 스핀(백 인사이드에서 포워드 아웃사이드만 해당) 또는 카멜스핀에서의 확실한 에지 변화

   6) 양 발 모두 세가지 기본 자세 수행

   7) 싯 또는 카멜 스핀에서 바로 이어지는 양방향 스핀 

   8) 자세, 발 또는 에지의 변화가 없는 최소 8회전(카멜, 싯, 레이백, 난도 높은 업라이트) : 발을 바꾸는 경우 최대 2회

   9) [레이백] 백워드에서 사이드웨이 또는 그 반대로의 한번의 포지션 변경, 각 포지션 별 최소 3회전 (레이백 스핀이 다른 스핀의 일부인 경우에도 카운트) 

   10) [레이백] 기본 레이백 스핀을 8회전 한 이후의 비엘만 자세

    --- 백워드 도입, 에지 변화, 각 어려운 변형 카테고리는 프로그램 당 한 번씩만 인정

    --- 쇼트 및 프리에서의 Level 2 ~ 4를 받으려면 아래 조건 충족

            a) 체인지 풋이 있는 콤비네이션 스핀: 세 가지 기본 포지션 모두 수행 

            b) 체인지 풋이 있는 스핀: 각 발로 최소 하나의 기본 포지션 수행 

    --- 체인지 풋이 포함된 모든 스핀에서 최대한 인정 받을 수 있는 요소의 수는 각 발 당 2개까지


2011/2012 season

Communication No.1672


1. 2T/2S 기초점이 2010/2011 이전으로 복귀 1.4 → 1.3

2. 스텝 시퀀스 레벨2 기초점 상향 2.3 → 2.6

3. 스텝 시퀀스 레벨 업 요소

   1) 어려운 턴 조합으로 레벨업을 하려면 적어도 3가지 턴의 서로 다른 조합 2가지 필요

   2) 상체의 움직임은 전체 패턴의 1/2 이상일 때 적용

4. 스핀 레벨 업 요소

   1) 스핀에서 에지 변화를 레이백과 비엘만 자세에서도 인정

   2) 8회전은 스핀 당 1회만 인정 (기본 싯 자세에서의 8회전 불인정)


2012/2013 season

Communication No.1724

Communication No.1741


1. 스핀과 스텝에 베이직 레벨(레벨B) 추가

2. 스텝 시퀀스 패턴 삭제

3. 스텝 시퀀스 레벨업 요소에서 원풋 스텝 삭제

4. 코레오그래픽 시퀀스 신설 : 레벨은 없고 GOE만 평가

   1) 시니어 남자 싱글 : 코레오그래픽 스텝 시퀀스 대치

   2) 시니어/주니어 여자 싱글 : 코레오 스파이럴 대치

5. 스핀 레벨 업 요소

   1) 어려운 변형을 제외한 나머지 모든 레벨업 요소는 프로그램당 1번만 인정

   2) 카멜, 싯, 레이백, 비엘만에서의 명확한 속도 증가 추가

   3) 스핀 카테고리

       - 중간 자세 → 비기본 자세

       - 속도 증가, 스핀 내 점프 : 어려운 변형이 아닌 단독 요소로 평가


판정과 관계 없는 변화

6. 싱글 스케이팅 쇼트 프로그램에서 후반부(1분 25초 이후)에 수행되는 점프에 1.1배의 기초점 부과

7. 코스튬의 일부나 장식이 얼음에 떨어지는 경우 레프리가 1점 디덕션

8. 2014/15 시즌부터 싱글/페어 스케이팅에 보컬 뮤직 허용



2013/2014 season

Communication No.1790


1. 스텝 레벨 1에 "최소한의 다양성" (minimum varitety) 문구 추가

2. "e" 표시가 없을 때에도 심판 재량에 따라 잘못된 도약 엣지에 대한 감점 가능



2014/2015 season

Communication No.1861

Communication No.1863

Communication No.1867


I. 점프 관련



1. 하위 기초점

   1) 1/4회전 초과, 1/2회전 미만 부족 : 언더로테이티드 (Under-rotated), "<" 표시, 원래 점프의 70% 기초점 - 감점은 심판 재량

       1/2회전 이상 부족 : 다운그레이디드 (Downgraded), "<<"표시, 원래 점프의 한 회전 아래 점프의 기초점 - 반드시 감점

   2) "e" : 심각한 롱엣지 (severe wrong edge), 원래 점프의 70% 기초점 - 반드시 감점

       "!" : 불분명한 롱엣지 (unclear wrong edge), 기초점 유지 - 감점은 심판 재량

   3) "<"와 "e"를 동시에 받는 경우 : 원래 점프의 50% 기초점

2. 1.5회전 미만의 점프는 점수를 주지 않는다. Communication No.1884에서 삭제

3. 쇼트 프로그램에서 필수 요건을 충족하지 못한 점프(잘못된 회전수)는 점수를 주지 않는다; 두 개의 더블 점프 컴비네이션(시니어 여자, 시니어 남자, 주니어 남자)이 허용되지 않는 경우, 더 낮은 점수의 점프는 인정되지 않는다.


II. 스핀, 스텝 관련



1. 하위 기초점 신설 : 아래 다섯 가지 필요 요건을 판정하여 결정한다. (플라잉 스핀, 체인지풋 스핀, 컴비네이션 스핀만 해당)

   1) 쇼트 프로그램과 프리 스케이팅에서 플라잉 스핀의 경우

       a) 확실하게 보이는 점프

       b) 랜딩 후 처음 2회전 이내에 기본 자세를 잡을 것

       c) 랜딩 후 두 바퀴를 유지

   2) 모든 체인지풋 스핀 : 한 발 당 적어도 하나의 기본 자세

   3) 발을 바꾸는 컴비네이션 스핀 : 세 가지의 기본 자세를 모두 포함

   --- "s" : 다섯 가지 필요 요건 중 하나가 충족되지 않은 경우, 원래 스핀 기초점의 70%

   --- "ss" : 다섯 가지 필요 요건 중 두 가지 이상이 충족되지 않은 경우, 원래 스핀 기초점의 50%

2. 스핀 레벨업 요소

   1) 백워드 도입은 더 이상 레벨업 요소가 아니다.

   2) 스핀 레벨업 요소에서 양 발 모두 3가지 기본 자세 수행 → 두 번째 발에서 3가지 기본 자세 수행

3. 스텝 시퀀스 레벨 업 요소에서 "상체의 움직임" → "몸의 움직임" (프리렉의 스윙도 인정)

4. 스텝 시퀀스 감점 항목 중 "지나치게 작은 패턴" 삭제


III. 55회 ISU 총회 이후 확정되는 것들

1. 남자 싱글, 여자 싱글, 페어 프리 스케이팅 경기 시간 통일 기각

   1) 시니어 남자 싱글/페어 : 4분 30초 → 4분

   2) 주니어 남자 싱글/페어 : 4분 → 3분 30초

2. 시니어/주니어 남자 싱글 프리 스케이팅 점프 8개 → 7개

3. 남자 싱글, 여자 싱글, 페어 스케이팅 PCS 팩터 통일

   1) 남자 싱글 : 쇼트 동일, 프리 2.0 → 1.8배

   2) 여자 싱글, 페어 : 쇼트 0.8배 → 1배, 프리 1.6배 → 1.8배

4. 더블 점프(더블 악셀 포함)도 두 종류의 더블 점프만 두 번까지 허용 (솔로 or 컴비네이션)

5. 코레오 시퀀스에서 2회전까지의 규정 점프, 스핀, 작은 리프트 허용, 트위즐 불가

6. 코레오 시퀀스와 스텝 시퀀스의 순서 규정(코레오를 나중에) 폐지

7. 모든 ISU 대회에서 프리 스케이팅 스타팅 오더는 쇼트 순위의 역순 기각


Communication No.1884


1. V1, V2 사인은 저지에게 보여 주지 않는다.

2. "1.5회전 미만 점프에 점수를 주지 않는다."는 문구 삭제

ISU Judging System: 2005/06 ~ 2014/15

한글은 여기


The ISU Judging System or International Judging System (IJS) has been applied to all figure skating competitions since 2004/2005 season. (For Grand Prix, 2003/2004 season) For the details, refer to each communication.



Major changes in Single Skating



2005/2006 season

Communication No.1319

ISUcommunication1319.pdf

Communication No.1342

ISUCommunication1342.pdf


1. Of all the triple or quadruple jumps, only two (2) can be repeated and these repetitions must be in jump combination or jump sequence. If a third repeated jump executed in a combination or a sequence, the entire combination or sequence will be treated as an additional element and therefore not considered.

(cf. 2004/2005 season : Only the repeated jump was treated as an additional element and the points for the other jumps were guaranteed.)

2. The position of a “Biellmann Spin” can only be taken and considered as a feature to increase the Level after having successfully rotated these required 8 revolutions in the layback-position (backward or sideways).

3. Changes in the base values and GOE (grade of execution) factors

   1) All spin, level 1&2 in Step/Spiral sequence : positive 0.5 / negative 0.3

   2) Level 3 in Step/Spiral sequence : positive 0.5 / negative 0.7

   3) Level 4 in Step/Spiral sequence : positive 1.0 / negative 0.7



2006/2007 season

Communication No.1384

ISUCommunication1384.pdf

Communication No.1396


1. Allow in Junior Ladies Short Programs a Jump Combination consisting of two double jumps or one double and one triple jump or two triple jumps.

2. In Singles Free Skating if a Triple or Quadruple Jump is performed twice as a Solo Jump, the second execution will be counted as a Jump Sequence with only one jump included. (80% of base value for the jump sequence)

(cf. Until 2005/2006 season : The second solo jump was counted as a Jump combination (Jump + COMBO) and got 100% of base value.)


Other changes irrelevant to the judgement

3. The base values are presented with two decimal places.

(cf. Until 2005/2006 : one decimal place)

4. The mark for loss of rotation in jumps ("<") are shown in the protocol.




2007/2008 season

Communication No.1445

ISUCommunication1445.pdf

Communication No.1459


1. The definition of a jump sequence should be modified as follows: "A jump sequence may consist of any number of jumps of any number of revolutions that may be linked by non-listed jumps and/or hops immediately following each other while maintaining the jump rhythm (knee); there can be no turns/steps*, crossovers or stroking during the sequence."

* Turns: three turns, twizzles, brackets, loops, counters, rockers.

  Steps: running steps, toe steps, chasses, mohawks, choctaws, curves with change of edge, cross-rolls.

2. The base value and the GOE factor of double axel

   1) Base value : 3.3 → 3.5

   2) Negative GOE factor : 0.7 → 0.8

3. A Double Axel can not be included more than three times in total in a Single’s Free Program (as a Solo Jump or a part of Combination/Sequence).

4. In obvious cases of starting from the wrong edge the Technical Panel will indicate this error to the Judges who must reduce their GOE accordingly. (Mark "e" in the protocol)

5. In Short Program there are no requirements on the pattern of the Spiral Sequence.

6. Additional feature for Levels in Spins : At least 8 revolutions without any changes in position/variation, foot and edge (camel, sit, layback, difficult variation of upright)



2008/2009 season

Communication No.1494

Communication No.1504

Communication No.1505


1. Increasing in the base values and GOE factors for triple axel(3A) and quadruple jumps :

   1) Base value of 3A : 7.5 → 8.2

   2) Negative GOE factor : 3A (1.4) / quadruple jumps (1.6)

2. Increasing in the base values of Step sequence level 3/4

3. Integration of feature for Levels in Spins

4. Short Program Junior Men: allow a double or a triple Axel Paulsen as a solo jump.

5. Have one element less in a Well Balanced Free Program of all the categories with the following result:

   1) Senior both Men and Ladies: maximum of three (3) spins, one of which must be a spin combination, one a flying spin and one a spin with only one position;

   2) Junior Men: maximum of one (1) step sequence;

   3) Junior Ladies: maximum of one (1) step sequence and no any Spiral Sequence;

6. Additional feature for levels in spiral sequence : Holding spiral position (without any interruption) for 6 or more seconds

7. Subdivision in evaluating the Flip and Lutz jumps 

   1) The Technical Panel will use the sign "e" (edge) for severe cases of wrong take-off edge (long wrong edge, no correct edge at all etc.); in these cases GOE of the Judges must be reduced by -1 to -3 and must be negative. 

   2) The Technical Panel will use the sign "!" (attention) in cases when a wrong take-off edge is short or not so obvious; in these cases the decision on the GOE is at the discretion of every Judge.



Communication No.1535

Reduced number of Judges in ISU Championships : 13 → 9



2009/2010 season

Communication No.1557


1. Features for Levels in Spins

   1) Clear change of edge in the same basic position (for each spin counts only once)

      (cf. In 2008/2009 season : Both edges in one basic position)

   2) One change of position backwards-sideways or reverse, at least 3 rev. in each position (counts also if the Layback spin is a part of a spin combination)
   3) In any spin with change of foot the maximum number of features attained on one foot is 3 
2. The sign “<” will not be shown to the Judges. They will evaluate the GOE as they see it (without slow motion)

   2.1. Change of Guidelines in establishing GOE for errors 

         "downgraded jumps" : -1 ~ -3 (Final GOE must be in the minuses)

         → "under rotated jumps" : -1 ~ -3 (Final GOE is not restricted) 

         (= Deletion of double penalties for under-rotated jumps)

3. Changes of the explanation for wrong edges

   1) "e" : wrong edge

   2) "!" : unclear edge



Communication No.1563

Reduced number of Judges in the Olympic Winter Games: 13 → 9



2010/2011 season

Communication No.1611

Communication No.1619

Technical Handbook for 2010/2011 season

TP_Handbook_2010v11.pdf

(from Feverskating. including all original contents)


I. Jumps

1. Subdivision of loss of rotation

   1) A Jump/Throw will be considered as "Under-rotated" if it has "missing rotation of more than 1/4, but less than 1/2 revolutions".

      : "<" mark. Reduced base value - 70% of the base value of the intended jump

   2) A Jump/Throw will be considered as "Downgraded" if it has "missing rotation of 1/2 revolutions or more".

      : "<<" mark. Base value for element of one rotation less (i.e. 2T for 3T<<)

2. Changes in Base values and GOE factors
   1) double axel : 0.5
   2) triple jumps : 0.7

   3) triple axel and quadruple jumps : 1.0 (1.2 for 4A)



3. Unification of wrong edge in Lutz/Flip jumps : "e" (Each Judge will then decide himself/herself on the severity of the error (major or minor error) and the corresponding GOE reduction.)

4. In Jump Combinations/Sequences Half-loop (or “Euler”) (landing backwards) will be a listed jump. Consequently the units “half-loop + Salchow/Flip” and “any jump landed backwards outside + halfloop + Salchow/Flip” will become jump combinations of 2 or 3 jumps correspondingly. Half-loop will have the Base Value and the GOE values of the single loop jump and will be identified by the Technical Panel to the Judges and in the Protocols as “1Lo”.

(i.e. First Jump + 1Lo + S/F : counted as "3 jumps combination" not a sequence. 100% of base value.)

5. Ladies, Senior can have either a double or a triple Axel. 

6. Men, Senior: it is possible to execute two different quadruple jumps - one in combination and one as solo jump. 

7. A Double Axel cannot be included more than two (2) times in total in a Single’s Free Program (as a Solo Jump or a part of Combination/Sequence).


II. Step/Spiral sequence

1. Additional features for Levels in Step sequence

   1) At least half a pattern on one foot only 

   2) Combination of difficult turns (rockers, counters, brackets, twizzles) quickly executed in both directions (at least twice within the sequence) 

2. Men, Seniors and Juniors: only one step sequence (straight line, circular or serpentine) is included. 

   2.1. For Senior Men the second (in the order of execution) step sequence will always be awarded a fixed Base value, called a choreographic step sequence and evaluated by Judges in GOE only.

3. Ladies, Seniors and Juniors

   1) Short program: no spiral sequence is included. Execution of Spirals will be rewarded in "Transitions".

   2) Free skating: The spiral sequence will always be awarded a fixed Base Value, called a choreographic spiral sequence and evaluated by Judges in GOE only. In this sequence there must be at least two (2) spiral positions not less than three (3) seconds long each or only one (1) spiral position not less than six (6) seconds long.



III. Spins

1. There are 13 categories of difficult variations:

   For CAMEL POSITION there are 3 categories based on direction of the belly button:

     - (CF) Camel Forward: with belly button facing forward

       

     - (CS) Camel Sideways: with belly button facing sideways

       

     - (CU) Camel Upward: with belly button facing upward

      

   For SIT POSITION there are 3 categories based on position of free leg:

     - (SF) Sit Forward: with leg forward

      

     - (SS) Sit Sideways: with leg sideways

     

     - (SB) Sit Behind : with the leg behind

     

   For UPRIGHT POSITION there are 3 categories based on position of torso:

     - (UF) Upright Forward: with torso leaning forward

     - (US) Upright Straight or Sideways: with torso straight up or sideways

     - (UB) Upright Biellmann: in Biellmann position

   For LAYBACK POSITION there is 1 category

     - (UL) Upright Layback

     

   For INTERMEDIATE POSITION there is 1 category (IP)

     

   For INCREASE OF SPEED there is 1 category (IS)

   For JUMP IN A SPIN there is 1 category (JS)

    

2. Overall changes in features for Levels

   1) A difficult variation in a basic or (for spin combinations only) in an intermediate position

   2) Another difficult variation in a basic position which must be significantly different from the first one and:

      - spin in one position with change of foot . on different foot than the first one

      - spin combination without change of foot . in different position than the first one

      - spin combination with change of foot . on different foot and in different position than the first one

   3) Change of foot executed by jump

   4) Backward entrance/Difficult variation of flying entrance/Landing on the same foot as take-off or changing foot on landing in a Flying Sit Spin

   5) Clear change of edge in sit (only from backward inside to forward outside) or camel

   6) All 3 basic positions on both feet

   7) Both directions immediately following each other in sit or camel spin

   8) At least 8 rev. without changes in pos./variation, foot or edge (camel, sit, layback, difficult upright), counts twice if repeated on another foot

   Additional features for the Layback spin:

   9) One change of position backwards-sideways or reverse, at least 3 rev. in each position (counts also if the Layback spin is a part of any other spin)

   10) Biellmann position after layback spin (SP . after 8 revolutions in layback spin)

   Backward entry, change of edge and any type of difficult spin variation count as features that can increase the Level only once per program (in the first spin they are attempted);

   The following requirements are mandatory for Levels 2 . 4 both in Short Program and Free Skating:

     a) for Spin Combinations with change of foot all 3 basic positions;

     b) for Spins with change of foot at least one basic position on each foot.

   In any spin with change of foot the maximum number of features attained on one foot is two (2).



2011/2012 season

Communication No.1672


1. Base value of 2T/2S : 1.4 → 1.3

2. Base value of Step sequence level 2 :2.3 → 2.6

3. Features for Levels in Step sequence

   1) Two different combinations of 3 difficult turns (rockers, counters, brackets, twizzles, loops) quickly executed within the sequence

   2) Use of upper body movements for at least 1/2 of the pattern

4. Features for Levels in Spins

   1) Clear change of edge in sit (only from backward inside to forward outside), camel, Layback and Biellmann position

   2) At least 8 rev. without changes in pos./variation, foot or edge (camel, difficult sit, layback, difficult upright), counts once per spin



2012/2013 season

Communication No.1724

Communication No.1741


1. Lifts, twist lifts and death spirals (pairs), spins and steps (singles and pairs) are divided depending on their difficulty in five (5) Levels according to the number of features achieved: Basic Level (B) - in case of no features, Level 1 - in case of one feature, Level 2 - in case of two features, Level 3 - in case of three features and Level 4 - in case of four or more features.

2. Step sequences no longer have a required pattern.

3. Features for Levels in Step sequence

   - At least half a pattern on one foot only : deleted

4. A Choreographic Sequence consist of any kind of movements like steps, turns, spirals, arabesques, spread eagles, Ina Bauers, hydroblading, transitional (unlisted) jumps, spinning movements etc. A Choreographic Sequence for Ladies must include at least one spiral (not a kick) of any length. A Choreographic Sequence for Pairs must include at least one spiral (not a kick) of any length by each partner. The Sequence commences with the first move and is concluded with the last move of the skater. The pattern is not restricted, but the Sequence must fully utilize the ice surface. If this requirement is not fulfilled, the Sequence will have no value. The Choreographic Sequence has to be performed later then the step sequence. The Choreographic Sequence has a base value and will be evaluated by the judges in GOE only.

5. Features for Levels in Spins

   1) All features for levels in Spins except difficult variations count only once per program.

   2) Clear increase of speed in camel, sit, layback or Biellmann position

   3) Spin categories

       - "Intermediate position" → "Non-basic position"

       - IS, JS → separate features (not a difficult variations)


Other changes irrelevant to the judgement

6. In the Short Program of Single Skating the base values (but not the GOE’s) for all jump elements started in the second half of the program will be multiplied by a special factor 1.1 in order to give credit for even distribution of difficulties in the program. Each factored base value for all jump elements performed in the second half of the Short Program will be rounded to two decimal places. The second half commences in the middle of the maximum time which means 1 min. 25 sec. 

7. A deduction - 1.0 will be applied by the Referee if a part of the costume/decoration falls on the ice. 

8. Starting from the season 2014-2015 vocal music with lyrics will be allowed.



2013/2014 season

Communication No.1790


1. Compulsory feature for Step sequence level 1 : Minimum variety 

   - Minimum variety must include at least 5 turns & 2 steps, none of the types can be counted more than twice.

2. Guidelines in establishing GOE for errors

   UNCLEAR EDGE TAKE-OFF F/Lz (no sign) -1 



2014/2015 season

Communication No.1861

Communication No.1863

Communication No.1867


I. Jumps



1. Lesser base values

   1) Full rotation: signs < and << indicate an error. The base value of the jump with a sign < is approximately 70% of the original base value. The jump with a sign << is evaluated with SOV for the same jump one revolution less. 

   2) Take-off edge in F/Lz: signs “e” and “!” indicate an error. The base value of the jump with a sign “e” is approximately 70% of the original base value. If both signs < and “e” are applied for the same jump, the base value is approximately 50% of the original base value. In cases of serious errors (sign “e”) the base value of the jump and the GOE are reduced, final GOE is negative. In cases of smaller errors (sign “!”) the original base value stays, the GOE is reduced, however the final GOE is not restricted. 

3. Jumps with less than 1,5 revs in both Short and Free programs of Seniors/Juniors will have no value. deleted in Communication No. 1884

4. In Short Program jumps which do not satisfy the requirements (wrong number of revolutions) will have no value; if a combination of two double jumps is not allowed (senior men and ladies, junior men), jump with a lesser value will not be counted. 


II. Spins, Step sequence



1. Lesser base values

   1) For flying spins of both Short Program and Free Skating: 

      a) a clear visible jump; 

      b) basic landing position reached within the first 2 revs; 

      c) held for 2 revs after the landing. 

   2) For any spin with change of foot: at least one basic position on each foot. 

   3) For spin combinations with change of foot: all 3 basic positions. 

   Sign “s” indicates that one of these 5 requirements was not fulfilled, the base value of a spin with a sign “s” is approximately 70% of the original base value. 

   Sign “ss” indicates that two or more of the 5 requirements were not fulfilled, the base value of a spin with a sign ”ss” is approximately 50% of the original base value. 

2. Features for Levels in Spins

   1) Regular backward entry is no longer considered a difficult entry. 

   2) All 3 basic positions on the booth feet → on the second foot

3. Features for Levels in Step sequence

   "Use of body movements for at least 1/3 of the pattern" - the visible use for a combined total of at least 1/3 of the pattern of the step sequence any movements of the arms, head, torso, hips and legs that have an effect on the balance of the main body core. 

   (* from "upper body")

4. Minus GOE guideline for step sequence : Incorrect pattern (too small) - deleted


III. Confirmed after 55th ISU Congress

1. Duration of Free Skating/Free Dance REJECTED

   1) Senior : Men, Ladies, Pairs, Ice Dance - 4 minutes

   2) Juinor : Men, Ladies, Pairs, Ice Dance - 3 1/2 minute

2. Reduced number of Jump elements in Senior/Junior Men : 8 → 7

3. PCS Factors

   1) Men : SP 1.0 / FS 2.0 → 1.8

   2) Ladies, Pair : SP 0.8 → 1.0 / FS 1.6 → 1.8

4. Any double jump (including double Axel) cannot be included more than twice in total in a Single’s Free Program (as a Solo Jump or a part of Combination / Sequence).

5. A Choreographic Sequence consists of any kind of movements like steps, turns (except twizzles), spirals, arabesques, spread eagles, Ina Bauers, hydroblading, any jumps with maximum of 2 revolutions, spins, small lifts etc. Listed elements included in the Choreographic Sequence will not be called and will not occupy a box. The pattern is not restricted, but the sequence must be clearly visible. 

6. The Technical Panel identifies the Choreographic Sequence which commences with the first skating movement and is concluded with the preparation to the next element (if the Choreographic Sequence is not the last element of the program). It can be performed before or after the Step Sequence.

7. [Rule 548, paragraph 3] There will be no draw for the order of skating in each group, competitors will skate in reverse order to their places in the preceding segment of the competition, that is, with the best placed Competitor skating last. The order of skating between tied Competitors shall be determined by a separate draw. REJECTED


Communication No. 1884


1. Signs V1 and V2 are not shown to the Judges.

2.  Jumps with less than 1,5 revs in both Short and Free programs of Seniors/Juniors will have no value. DELETED

Cinquanta is above Rule 121 : Conflict of Interest

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2014-02-21/sports/chi-sochi-figure-skating-controversy-20140221_1_international-skating-union-figure-skating-official-isu


SOCHI, Russia ? Ottavio Cinquanta of Italy, president of figure skating’s international federation, was unaware of a controversy over the results in the Olympic women’s event that ended Thursday with Adelina Sotnikova of Russia beating defending champion Yuna Kim of South Korea.

Alexander Lakernik of Russia, head of the three-member technical panel that helped determine those results, knew the decision had become a “big issue” but insisted such questions were to be expected.


That two leading officials of the International Skating Union would react in that way illustrates a gap between perception and reality that the federation makes no attempt to reduce. Its failure to give explanations for even those parts of the judging that are the most objective, such as which mistakes lower a spin’s base level, further undermines the sport’s shaky credibility.

Both spoke exclusively to the Tribune on Friday, Cinquanta by telephone, Lakernik at his hotel in the Sochi Olympic Park.

At a time when dissemination of such explanations to a wide audience never has been easier, Cinquanta clearly did not grasp the need to provide it in a timely manner.


“I’ll get back to you tomorrow,” was his answer to the request for official rationales behind the scores.


Because he had been on the judging panel, Lakernik declined to identify those reasons without Cinquanta’s approval.


“I’m not hiding anything,” Lakernik said.


So thousands of TV viewers around the world are left feeling Sotnikova won because the event took place in Russia. It makes no difference that a TV screen does not provide an accurate impression of the performance as seen by judges at rinkside. Outraged viewers smell rancid home cooking.


“It could be the judging was more favorable for Russian skaters,” said 1984 Olympic pairs champion Oleg Vasiliev, a Russian. “But Adelina skated great, and she deserved it.”


Cinquanta was stunned to be told some are likening what happened in the women’s event to the 2002 judging scandal in Salt Lake City.


“I don’t understand the use of this word,” he said.


The comparison is, for now, quite a stretch. In Salt Lake City, a judge revealed she had been pressured into a vote-trading deal that would help guarantee a Russian victory in pairs for a French win in ice dance. In the wake of that, the International Olympic Committee ordered the ISU to award a second pairs gold medal to the Canadians who had finished second in pairs, in which Lakernik was the assistant referee.

Spokesman Mark Adams said Friday morning the IOC would take no action in this case without a “credible complaint” made to the skating federation. The ISU released a statement just before midnight saying it had not received any official protest.


“Any result in this way would be questionable because there were great performances who could be considered better or worse from a different angle,'' Lakernik said. “Yuna Kim could be first or Carolina Kostner (the Italian who was third) could be first, and it would be the same story. Some people would think another result is correct. But the result is the product of many details.”


The details that raised the most eyebrows involved the component scores, which evaluate five areas under specific criteria but seem as subjective as the artistic impression scores in the old 6.0 system.


In her previous four competitions this season, Sotnikova’s free skate component scores were, in order, 60.31, 64.65, 60.47 and 69.60. The Olympic judges gave her 74.41, just .09 behind Kim, clearly the more aesthetically pleasing skater.


“If you skate well, you are marked well, and (Sotnikova) definitely did the performance of her life,” said Lakernik, whose job in determining the results did not involve the component scores.


The presence of two people on the judging panel, which grades the execution of the elements and components, understandably has fueled criticism.

One judge, Alla Shekhovtseva, is married to Valentin Piseev, former president of the Russian Figure Skating Federation and its current general director. Another, Yuri Balkov of Ukraine, was suspended for one year for being part of a result-fixing affair in 1998.

One is a clear conflict of interest. The other is akin to having a bank rehire an employee caught for embezzling.


“Would you rather have an idiot acting as a judge than a good one who is a relative of the manager of a federation?” Cinquanta said. “It is far more important to have a good judge than a possible conflict of interest.


“I can’t suspend a person for life for a minor violation. (Balkov) is a matter for the Ukraine federation because they chose to send him.”


That is another issue. Judges have no independence because national federations train them and decide which ones to nominate for big assignments.

None of this is new, but the new judging system ? implemented after Salt Lake City ? was supposed to make the results less debatable.

To Scott Hamilton, the 1984 singles champion and a TV commentator, the controversy is the best thing that could have happened.


“You’re going to be around the water cooler and everybody is going to have an opinion, and I love it because it will make everyone care about the sport again,” 


he said, laughing.

--------------------------------

About Rule 121


Rule 123 & 124 : No Protests are Allowed in Figure Skating


ISU Constitution and General Regulations 2012

http://static.isu.org/media/79153/2012_constitution_and_general_regulations.pdf


Rule 123


3. Time limits for filing protests 


b) Protests concerning the composition of the panel of Officials must be filed within one hour of its announcement. 

c) Any other protests, except cases covered by subparagraph d) below, must be filed with the Referee immediately, however, not later than 30 minutes after the completion of the competition concerned. Completion of a competition (for this purpose only) means end of the last race of all races for a single distance in Speed Skating, end of the last heat/qualifying round or of the last of a series of heats/qualifying rounds, or all four quarter finals or of the last of both semi-finals or of the final for a single distance in Short Track Speed Skating, and end of any single segment (Short Program / Free Skating / Pattern Dance / Short Dance / Free Dance) of a Figure Skating competition.

d) Protests against incorrect mathematical calculation may be filed until 24 hours after the completion of the competition concerned. (See also paragraph 4. A. iii) below). If the Referee is not available in person at the site or hotel, the Protest shall be sent by fax or email to the Secretariat which will forward it to the Referee concerned. 


4. Protest restrictions 


A. Figure Skating 

 i) No protests against evaluations by Referees, Judges and the Technical Panel (Technical Controller, Technical Specialists, Data & Replay Operator) of Skaters’ performances are allowed; 

 ii) Protests against results are permitted only in the case of incorrect mathematical calculation. A wrong identification of an element or of a level of difficulty, although it results in a lower or higher score, is a human error and not an incorrect mathematical calculation; 


5. Referee’s decision


a) The Referee shall decide upon any protest in writing and as soon as possible. The Referee shall deliver such decision to the person filing the protest or shall arrange such delivery. Copies of any protest and Referee decision shall be forwarded to the Secretariat. 

b) If a protest is filed: 

i) after the time limit or 

ii) which is not allowed by the Rules, 

the Referee shall dismiss the protest in writing with reference to the applicable Rule but without dealing with the merits of the claim. 

e) The Referee’s decision upon a protest is final and there is no appeal against such decision except in cases specified in Rule 124. 


Rule 124 


1. Appeals 


An appeal may be made to the Council only against decisions which concern the eligibility of a Competitor, the incorrect calculation of the result, or the composition of the panel of Officials and only in cases where the ISU Statutes relating to the afore-mentioned subjects have been contravened. 

2. Every appeal against a decision of the Referee must be submitted to the Council of the ISU within 30 days from the issuance of the decision.  

3. Appeals do not have the effect of deferring the decision. 

4. Appeals may be lodged only by those entitled to lodge protests (see Rule 123, paragraph 2). 



ISU 저징 시스템에서 패널의 지정


English is here


ISU Constitution and General Regulations 2012

http://static.isu.org/media/79153/2012_constitution_and_general_regulations.pdf


ISU Special Regulations & Technical Rules Single & Pair Skating and Ice Dance 2012

http://static.isu.org/media/79156/2012_specialregulations_technicalrules_singleandpair_icedance.pdf


List of Officials 2013/14 for Single & Pair Skating, Ice Dance and Synchronized Skating

http://static.isu.org/media/142150/1812-list-officials-fs-id-sys-2013-2014-updated-oct-8.pdf


Grand Prix of Figure Skating 2013/2014 General Announcement

http://isu.sportcentric.net/db//files/serve.php?id=4555




Rule 121 오피셜들


1. 카테고리

2. 오피셜 지정의 제한


b) 의회 멤버와 스포츠 이사회 멤버, 가능하다면 ISU 고문은 Rule 107에 지정된 대회에서 레프리, 저지, 테크니컬 스페셜리스트, 테크니컬 컨트롤러, 데이터&리플레이 오퍼레이터, OAC 멤버, 개회자, 선수들 관리인으로 활동해서는 안 된다.

e) 기술 위원회 멤버는 그들이 적절한 규정에 따라 저지로 인증되었다고 해도, 가능하다면, 그들의 적절한 분야 내의 경기에서 저지로 활동해서는 안 된다. 그러나 그들은 레프리, 테크니컬 컨트롤러로는 활동할 수 있다.


j) 개인적, 상업적, 가족 관계

ISU 이벤트나 동계 올림픽, 동계 유스 올림픽에서, 선수의 가족(family)에 해당하는 사람은 해당 선수가 경기하는 분야의 오피셜로 활동하는 것이 금지되지만, 이해 상충이 발생하는 상황이 아니라면 그 ISU 이벤트, 동계 올림픽 혹은 동계 유스 올림픽의 다른 분야에는 참가할 수 있다.


4. ISU 이벤트나 동계 올림픽, 동계 유스 올림픽에서, ineligible person의 가족(family)에 해당하는 사람이나 보수를 지불받는 코치의 가족(family)은 그들의 학생이 참가하는 분야의 오피셜로 활동하는 것이 금지되지만, 이해 상충이 발생하는 상황이 아니라면 그 ISU 이벤트, 동계 올림픽 혹은 동계 유스 올림픽의 다른 분야에는 참가할 수 있다.


5. 이 룰에서 말하는 용어 "family"는 경기하는 선수, ineligible person, 보수를 지불받는 코치와 이해 상충이 발생할 것으로 보이는 관계에 있는 모든 이를 지칭한다.


6. 레프리는 지정된 ISU 오피셜들에게 ISU 윤리강령을 적용하여 볼 때 이해 상충이 발생할 모든 상황에 대해 결정을 내려야 한다.



Rule 352 ISU Judging System


e) 

최대 9명의 저지 : 발행된 목록에서 선택

1명의 레프리, 1명의 TS, 1명의 어시스턴트 TS(이하 ATS), 1명의 TC : ISU 이벤트의 경우 각각 발행된 목록에서 ISU가 직접 지정



Rule 410 올림픽에서 오피셜 지정


2. 올림픽 개최국은 그들의 레프리/테크니컬 컨트롤러/테크니컬 스페셜리스트를 싱글/페어 스케이팅에 2명, 아이스댄스에 1명을 추천할 수 있고, 그들은 ISU 위원들 중 한 명이어도 된다.



Rule 402 올림픽에서 저지


1. 

a) 전년도 월드 챔피언십 결과에 따라 퀄리파잉한 국가에서 13명을 추첨한다.

f) 쇼트 시작 전 레프리에 의해 13명 중 9명을 추첨한다. 이 때 추첨되지 않은 4명은 프리에 자동으로 배정되며, 쇼트 저지 9명 중 5명을 추첨하여 프리 저지 9명을 완성한다.



Rule 420 국제 대회에서 오피셜의 지정 (일반 룰)


6. a) 모든 ISU 이벤트, 올림픽 게임의 퀄리파잉 경기, 동계 올림픽에 있어서, 가능하다면, 레프리, 테크니컬 컨트롤러, 테크니컬 스페셜리스트는 같은 국적이어서는 안 되며 모두 ISU에 의해 지정되어야 한다.

7. 국제 대회를 개최하는 연맹은 패널 오브 저지를 최대한 많은 참가국으로 구성하기 위해 최선을 다해야 한다.



Rule 421 챔피언십에서 오피셜의 지정 (특별 룰)


2. 개최국은 그들의 레프리/테크니컬 컨트롤러/테크니컬 스페셜리스트를 싱글/페어 스케이팅에 2명, 아이스댄스에 1명을 추천할 수 있고, 그들은 ISU 위원들 중 한 명이어도 된다.

4. ISU 챔피언십 조직위원회 멤버는 해당 챔피언십에서 레프리, TC, TS, DRO, OAC 멤버, 저지로 활동할 수 없다.



Rule 582 저지 추첨


ISU 챔피언십


4. a) 각국 멤버는 각 퀄리파잉한 종목에 한 명의 저지(개인이 아닌 국가에 할당)를 보낼 수 있다.

6. a) 유럽 챔피언십에서는 유럽 출신 저지들만 추첨에 참가할 수 있다.

c, g & h) 쇼트와 프리의 저지 배정 방식은 올림픽과 동일. (13명 → 9명 → 4명+5명)

7. c) 사대륙 챔피언십의 경우 13명의 풀을 선택하지 않고 직접 9명을 추첨한다.



그랑프리 일반 규정


7.3 패널 오브 저지

가능하다면 각 종목마다 서로 다른 국적을 가진 9명의 저지로 구성된다. 인터내셔널 혹은 ISU 저지가 그랑프리 시리즈 이벤트에 참가하는 것이 가능하다. 각 저지는 그랑프리 시리즈 두 개 대회까지, 추가로 파이널에 참가할 수 있다. 개최국은 ISU가 승인한 과정에 따라 저지들을 초청한다.


9.6 패널 오브 저지 (그랑프리 파이널)


패널 오브 저지는 가능하다면 서로 다른 국적을 가진 9명의 저지로 구성되며, 7명보다 적어서는 안 된다. 저지는 "ISU 저지"여야 한다. 저지의 초청장은 ISU 사무국이 발행한다.


어떤 저지도 ISU 그랑프리 파이널과 주니어 그랑프리 파이널에서 두 개 이상의 분야에서 활동할 수 없다.


패널 구성의 우선 순위는 다음과 같다:

a) 시니어 파이널 참가국

b) 주니어 파이널 참가국

c) 필요하다면, 각 ISU 그랑프리 이벤트 개최국

d) 필요하다면, ISU 주니어&시니어 그랑프리 파이널에 참가하지만 a)와 b)에 언급되지 않으면서 저지를 갖고 있는 국가

e) 필요하다면, ISU 주니어&시니어 그랑프리 파이널 개최국

f) 필요하다면, 시니어 파이널에 대기자로 퀄리파잉한 스케이터/커플 소속국

g) 필요하다면, 주니어 파이널에 대기자로 퀄리파잉한 스케이터/커플 소속국

h) 필요하다면, 시니어 파이널에 퀄리파잉하지 못한 스케이터/커플 소속국이면서 대기자가 아닌 스케이터/커플 중 가장 높은 포인트를 가진 스케이터/커플 소속국


저지의 초청장은 ISU 사무국이 2013/14시즌 마지막 그랑프리 이벤트(로스텔레콤 컵)이 끝난 즉시 발행한다.


저지로 결정된 국가는 해당 저지의 이름(들)을 2013년 11월 28일까지 제출하여야 한다.


저지의 선택은 각 국에 맡긴다. 각 국은 모든 선택된 저지와 대기 저지에 대하여 제 시간에 여행 서류를 준비할 의무가 있다.



The Panel of Judges in ISU Judging System


한글은 여기


ISU Constitution and General Regulations 2012

http://static.isu.org/media/79153/2012_constitution_and_general_regulations.pdf


ISU Special Regulations & Technical Rules Single & Pair Skating and Ice Dance 2012

http://static.isu.org/media/79156/2012_specialregulations_technicalrules_singleandpair_icedance.pdf


List of Officials 2013/14 for Single & Pair Skating, Ice Dance and Synchronized Skating

http://static.isu.org/media/142150/1812-list-officials-fs-id-sys-2013-2014-updated-oct-8.pdf


Grand Prix of Figure Skating 2013/2014 General Announcement

http://isu.sportcentric.net/db//files/serve.php?id=4555






Rule 121 Officials


1. Categories



2. Restrictions applying to appointed Officials:


b) Council members and Sports Directorate members shall not and ISU Advisors if possible should not act as Referees, Judges, Technical Specialists, Technical Controllers, Data & Replay Operators, OAC members, Starters and Competitors Stewards in competitions specified in Rule 107. 

e) Members of the Technical Committees, although they are approved as Judges according to the provisions of the relevant Rules in the respective Special Regulations should not, if possible, act as Judges in competitions of their appropriate Branch.


j) Personal, Commercial and Family Relationships 

 i) The ISU Code of Ethics, including but not limited to its conflict of interest” provisions, is applicable to appointed ISU Officials and other participants as stated in the ISU Code of Ethics; 

 ii) Without detracting from the broad and personal applicability of the Code of Ethics, the following examples are presented for guidance: 

1. At an ISU Event or the Olympic Winter Games or the Winter Youth Olympic Games Office Holders, elected or appointed, shall not act as members of any national team, or act as team leaders, assistant team leaders, chaperons, team doctors or team coaches, or wear national team uniforms (except Coaches serving on an ISU Technical Committee, may coach individually their students who are entered in an ISU Event or an international competition). 

2. For the Figure Skating Branch only, ISU Officials (Referees, Judges, Technical Controllers, Technical Specialists, etc.), when at an ISU Event or the Olympic Winter Games or the Winter Youth Olympic Games where they are not serving as an ISU Official, may act as a member of a national team, team leader, assistant team leader, chaperon, team doctor or team coach, and may wear national team uniforms. 

3. At an ISU Event or the Olympic Winter Games or the Winter Youth Olympic Games, a person of the family of a competing Skater is not permitted to serve as an Official of the competition in which such Skater is entered, but such person may serve at other competitions of such ISU Event or the Olympic Winter Games or the Winter Youth Olympic Games unless such service may reasonably appear to be a conflict of interest. 


4. At an ISU Event or the Olympic Winter Games or the Winter Youth Olympic Games, a person of the family of an ineligible person, or of the family of a remunerated Coach, is not permitted to serve as an Official of the competition in which a competing pupil of the ineligible person or remunerated Coach is entered, but such person may serve at other competitions of such ISU Event or the Olympic Winter Games or the Winter Youth Olympic Games unless such service may reasonably appear to be a conflict of interest. 


5. The term ”family” as used in this Rule shall be understood as including all persons who, due to their relationships, may reasonably appear to be in a conflict of interest position regarding a competing Skater, ineligible person or remunerated Coach.


6. For purposes of staffing at an event, the Referee(s) shall decide any issues raised at the event concerning conflicts of interest or other matters involving the applicability of the ISU Code of Ethics to assigned ISU Officials. 



Rule 352 ISU Judging System


e) A maximum of 9 Judges selected from the published ISU list of Judges and Referees will be used for the selection and composition of the panel for each category of a competition; 

A Referee from the published ISU list of Referees will be appointed to take care of the panel and oversee the event based on all applicable ISU Rules and Regulations. 

A Technical Specialist and an Assistant Technical Specialist from the published ISU list of Technical Specialists, will be appointed and used to determine whether an element and which element has or has not been performed. A Technical Controller from the published list of Technical Controllers will be appointed in each event to supervise the work of the Technical Specialists in that event;



Rule 410 Appointment of Officials to the Olympic Winter Games 


2. The Member for the country in which the Olympic Winter Games are held may recommend to serve not more than two of its own Referees/ Technical Controllers/Technical Specialists for Single & Pair Skating plus one Referee/Technical Controller/Technical Specialist for Ice Dance, including those that are also ISU Office Holders.



Rule 402 Panels of Judges for the Olympic Winter Games


1. a) For each discipline thirteen (13) Judges shall be drawn from those Members which have Skaters qualified for the Olympic Winter Games according to the results of the World Championships of the preceding year in the discipline concerned.

f) For the first segment of the event nine (9) Judges will be drawn from all thirteen (13) Judges drawn for the respective event. For the second segment of the event, the four (4) Judges not drawn for the first segment will automatically be assigned to be in the panel of nine (9) Judges for the second segment and all other Judges serving already in the first segment will participate in the draw to complete the panel of nine (9) Judges.



Rule 420 Appointment of Officials to International Competitions (general) 


6. a) For all ISU Events, Qualifying Competition for the Olympic Games and the Olympic Winter Games, if possible, the Referee, Technical Controller and the Technical Specialists must not be from the same Member and all must be designated ISU.

7. Members organizing International Competitions must do their utmost, in composing the panels of Judges, to secure representation on the panels of Judges from as many participating Members as possible. 



Rule 421 Appointments of Officials to ISU Championships (special Rule)


2. The Organizing Member may recommend to serve not more than two of its own Referees/Technical Controllers/Technical Specialists for Single and Pair Skating and one of its own Referees/Technical Controllers/Technical Specialists for Ice Dance, including those who are also ISU Office Holders. 

4. A member of the Organizing Committee of an ISU Championship may not serve as a Referee, Technical Controller, Technical Specialist, Data & Replay Operator, OAC member or Judge at the Championship concerned.



Rule 582 Judges Draws 


* ISU Championships


4. a) Each ISU Member may enter one Judge by number (not by name) in each discipline in which Judges of this Member are qualified to judge and in which that Member has participated with at least one (1) Skater/Couple in the same Championships or (for the season 2012/2013 only) its Preliminary Rounds (see subparagraphs 6.d), 7.c) and 8.d)) of the preceding year, who has/have finished at least one segment of the individual competition or reached in the Preliminary Round the minimal number of points established for that year. 

6.a) Only European ISU Members who have entered with Judges for the European Figure Skating Championships will participate in the draws for the composition of the panel of Judges for this Championships. 

c, g & h) Judge Draw : same as Olympics

7. c) Nine (9) ISU Members are drawn amongst all the ISU Members of the Four Continents, who have entered a Judge by number for this particular discipline and who have participated with a Competitor/Couple in the same discipline of the Four Continents Figure Skating Championships of the immediate preceding year, provided that this Competitor/Couple had finished at least one segment (see also paragraph 4. a). 



* Grand Prix General Announcement


7.3 Panel of Judges

The panel of Judges in each individual event of the ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating will consist of 9 Judges of different ISU Members in each discipline if possible, but not less than 7 Judges. Only International or ISU Judges are eligible to serve in the ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating events. Each Judge may participate in no more than two ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating events plus the ISU Grand Prix of Skating Final. The Organizing ISU Members will invite the Judges based on a procedure agreed with the ISU.


9.6 Panel of Judges (* Grand Prix Final)


The panel of Judges will consist of 9 Judges of different ISU Members in each discipline, if possible, but not less than 7 Judges. Judges must have the qualification of “ISU Judge”. The invitations to the Judges will be issued by the ISU Secretariat.

No Judge may serve in more than two disciplines of the ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final and two disciplines of the ISU Junior Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final 2013/14 each.

The composition of the panels of Judges in each category will be made in accordance with the following procedure:

a) first priority will be given to the participating ISU Members in the Senior Final;

b) second priority will be given to the participating ISU Members in the Junior Final;

c) third priority, if necessary, will be given to the ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating organizing Members of individual ISU Grand Prix events (Senior);

d) fourth priority, if necessary, will be given to the ISU Members with Judges present at the ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final (Junior and Senior), but not mentioned under a) and b);

e) fifth priority, if necessary, will be given to the host Member of the ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final and the ISU Junior Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final;

f) sixth priority, if necessary, will be given to the ISU Members with Skaters/Couples qualified as alternates in the Senior Final;

g) seventh priority, if necessary, will be given to the ISU Members with Skaters/Couples qualified as alternates in the Junior Final;

h) eighth priority, if necessary, will be given to the ISU Members with Skaters/Couples not qualified for the ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final, with priority to the discipline concerned, starting from that Skater/Couple with the highest total amount of points but not being alternate for the final.


The invitations to the Judges will be issued by the ISU Secretariat immediately following the last event of the ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating 2013/14 (Rostelecom Cup).

The respective ISU Members entitled to nominate a Judge must submit the name of the Judge(s) not later than November 28, 2013.

The selection of Judges will be made by the respective Member. The Members are responsible for providing all selected and stand-by Judges with the appropriate travel documents in time.